Elected Officials to Protect New York
On Monday, June 4, more than 280 local elected officials from 34 counties across New York State called on Governor Cuomo to continue the fracking moratorium and to do additional study before a decision is made whether to allow fracking. Their request, which they delivered in the form of a letter to the Governor, crosses political lines and comes from elected officials from more than half of New York State’s counties.
At a press conference in Albany, elected officials shared issues of concern to municipalities and released their letter to Governor Cuomo. They spoke about how the Department of Environmental Conservation’s (DEC) review of fracking has significant shortcomings. To address their concerns, a number of studies are needed before—not after—any decision is made about fracking and before fracking commences anywhere in the state.
One of the elected officials who started the initiative, Town of Caroline Deputy Supervisor Dominic Frongillo, said, “As local elected officials, we are on the front lines of this issue, and a number of critical studies have not been done to determine the consequences of fracking and drilling operations to the constituents we represent. The impacts of fracking don’t respect municipal boundaries or political parties, which is why we’ve already seen such an overwhelming and bipartisan response in support of this initiative from across the state.”
Among their concerns are the cumulative health impacts of fracking, so they are calling for a comprehensive and independent cumulative health impact assessment. Town of Rochester Supervisor Carl Chipman said, “The revised SGEIS on the extraction of natural gas by hydraulic fracturing presented by the DEC falls very short of resolving and even discussing many concerns involving the impacts on the health, safety, and general well being of our residents as well as the economic impacts to our communities. As an elected official, failure to oppose lifting the moratorium on hydraulic fracturing in New York would be a disservice to those whom I’m elected to represent.”
Elected Officials to Protect New York’s request to the governor also called for revised and thorough studies of all potentially negative socioeconomic impacts (not just the benefits, as the current study outlines) and of cumulative environmental impacts related to fracking and drilling operations. They pointed out that thorough study was significantly lacking in the SGEIS of impacts relating to these concerns, including increased demands on local governments, increased strain on first responders and law enforcement, effects on property values and home mortgages, impacts on existing businesses and economies, local community character, water resources, air quality, greenhouse gas emissions and more.
Justin Riccobono, Council Member At Large in the City of Beacon, urged extreme caution: “As a Republican and a conservative, I feel there are too many risks involved for our watershed and air quality than there are benefits. If something goes wrong, we may never be able to correct the problem. I encourage all New Yorkers to research the issues with hydrofracking in the states of Wyoming, Pennsylvania and West Virginia.”
Elected Officials to Protect New York noted that they agree with Governor Cuomo that a decision on fracking should be based on the science, but they believe the facts and science available currently leave many serious questions unanswered. Albany Common Council Member Leah Golby said, “It is imperative that a decision on fracking be based on the facts, like the Governor has said it will be, but as it stands New York State has not adequately looked at the science and facts on many issues of serious concern. We respectfully urge Governor Cuomo to maintain New York’s moratorium and to hold off on making a decision until the requested independent and thorough studies have been completed and we have all of the facts.”
Elected officials from the Southern Tier were quick to point out that the perception that the Southern Tier wants fracking is wrong. Town of Afton Councilmember Mary Jo Long said, “Just because we have been unable to get our town boards to pass bans or moratoria to date does not mean we want our community fracked. Senator Libous does not speak for a large portion of the Southern Tier.”
City of Elmira Mayor Susan Skidmore said, “My opinion is that all the facts are not being considered. Local environmental and infrastructure studies and current conditions of these items are not understood or taken into consideration. I am very concerned about the impact to my city. I see it as a burden to the residents to shoulder what is left when these large companies cap the wells and employment drops to a few part time maintenance positions. It will and has destroyed our property values and our ability to afford our own homes and rental properties.”
Syracuse Common Councilor Kathleen Joy said, “Even though Syracuse is protected, New York is one state. If it’s not safe in one municipality’s watershed, it’s not safe anywhere. We shouldn’t be putting any of New York’s citizens at risk. The risks of fracking don’t change from one municipality to the next, neither should state policy.”
Elected Officials to Protect New York is a broad-based and nonpartisan group of elected officials seeking to open a dialogue with the Governor’s office on these issues. Frongillo made the point that there needs to be an ongoing conversation between the Governor’s office and local officials: “Whatever is eventually decided about fracking, we need to be consulted and involved. We’re the boots on the ground, representing villages, cities, towns, and counties. The bipartisan, geographically-diverse group of elected officials that has joined together on this letter stands ready to work with the DEC and the Governor for the best possible future for all of New York State.”
Elected Officials to Protect New York will continue to collect signatures on the letter to Governor Cuomo on its website.
Visit EcoWatch’s FRACKING page for more related news on this topic.
























How I wish we had even just one elected official in my state who would even look at the evidence. The good old boys here have their hands so deep in the pockets of big oil and their heads in the sand so deep they don’t want to even be informed. I am really scared for myself and the future of North Dakota. They are “fracking” away here and we are being experimented on. We need federal protection from this now because our govenor and atty general have over one million to fight the EPA. Thats how bad our state government is. Keep up the fight New york, Pennsylvania etc. Your leading the way!
For disabled people, ask yourself this: How will I get even bottled water when the TV news announces DO NOT DRINK ANY TAP WATER A FRACKING ACCIDENT HAS OCCURRED AND POISONOUS RADIOACTIVE CHEMICALS HAVE LEACHED INTO LAKE ERIE. THE LAKE IS NO LONGER A WATER SOURCE FOR W.N.Y. You thought gas prices were high, just imagine how expensive WATER will be.
I am an Advovcate of Drilling in UPSTATE NY.. and it does not affect the entire state, PA is a clear example of this.. .. keeping UPSTATE NEW YORK POOR is BS.. I own a lot of property and live on that property, if youwant to protect the WATER SHED by all means do.. but do not take away the RIGHTS of LAND USAGE from the rest of the STATE.. LASTLY NOEN OF THIS REQUIRES any TOXIC CHEMICALS ANYWAY.. ww.gasfrac.com makes this clear.. so please stop the BS..
and here’s a list of the “non-toxic” chemicals:
CAS Number Parameters Detected in Flowback from PA and WV Operations
00087-61-6 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
00095-63-6 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
00108-67-8 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
00105-67-9 2,4-Dimethylphenol
00087-65-0 2,6-Dichlorophenol
00078-93-3 2-Butanone / Methyl ethyl ketone
00091-57-6 2-Methylnaphthalene
00095-48-7 2-Methylphenol
109-06-8 2-Picoline (2-methyl pyridine)
00067-63-0 2-Propanol / Isopropyl Alcohol / Isopropanol / Propan-2-ol
00108-39-4 3-Methylphenol
00106-44-5 4-Methylphenol
00072-55-9 4,4 DDE
00057-97-6 7,12-Dimethylbenz(a)anthracene
00064-19-7 Acetic acid
00067-64-1 Acetone
00098-86-2 Acetophenone
00107-13-1 Acrylonitrile
00309-00-2 Aldrin
07439-90-5 Aluminum
07440-36-0 Antimony
07664-41-7 Aqueous ammonia
12672-29-6 Aroclor 1248
07440-38-2 Arsenic
07440-39-3 Barium
00071-43-2 Benzene
00050-32-8 Benzo(a)pyrene
00205-99-2 Benzo(b)fluoranthene
191-24-2 Benzo(ghi)perylene
00207-08-9 Benzo(k)fluoranthene
00100-51-6 Benzyl alcohol
07440-41-7 Beryllium
00111-44-4 Bis(2-Chloroethyl) ether
00117-81-7 Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate / Di (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
07440-42-8 Boron
24959-67-9 Bromide
00075-25-2 Bromoform
07440-43-9 Cadmium
07440-70-2 Calcium
00124-38-9 Carbon Dioxide
00075-15-0 Carbondisulfide
00124-48-1 Chlorodibromomethane
00067-66-3 Chloroform
07440-47-3 Chromium
103 This table contains information compiled from flowback analyses submitted to the Department by well operators as well as
flowback information from the Marcellus Shale Coalition Study.
Revised Draft SGEI S 2011, Page 5-103
CAS Number Parameters Detected in Flowback from PA and WV Operations
07440-48-4 Cobalt
07440-50-8 Copper
00057-12-5 Cyanide
00319-85-7 Cyclohexane (beta BHC)
00058-89-9 Cyclohexane (gamma BHC)
00055-70-3 Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
00075-27-4 Dichlorobromomethane
00084-74-2 Di-n-butyl phthalate
00122-39-4 Diphenylamine
00959-98-8 Endosulfan I
33213-65-9 Endosulfan II
07421-93-4 Endrin aldehyde
00107-21-1 Ethane-1,2-diol / Ethylene Glycol
00100-41-4 Ethyl Benzene
00206-44-0 Fluoranthene
00086-73-7 Fluorene
16984-48-8 Fluoride
00076-44-8 Heptachlor
01024-57-3 Heptachlor epoxide
00193-39-5 Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
07439-89-6 Iron
00098-82-8 Isopropylbenzene (cumene)
07439-92-1 Lead
07439-93-2 Lithium
07439-95-4 Magnesium
07439-96-5 Manganese
07439-97-6 Mercury
00067-56-1 Methanol
00074-83-9 Methyl Bromide
00074-87-3 Methyl Chloride
07439-98-7 Molybdenum
00091-20-3 Naphthalene
07440-02-0 Nickel
00086-30-6 N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
00085-01-8 Phenanthrene
00108-95-2 Phenol
57723-14-0 Phosphorus
07440-09-7 Potassium
00057-55-6 Propylene glycol
00110-86-1 Pyridine
00094-59-7 Safrole
07782-49-2 Selenium
07440-22-4 Silver
07440-23-5 Sodium
07440-24-6 Strontium
14808-79-8 Sulfate
14265-45-3 Sulfite
00127-18-4 Tetrachloroethylene
07440-28-0 Thallium
Revised Draft SGEI S 2011, Page 5-104
CAS Number Parameters Detected in Flowback from PA and WV Operations
07440-32-6 Titanium
00108-88-3 Toluene
07440-62-2 Vanadium
07440-66-6 Zinc
2-Picoline
Alkalinity
Alkalinity, Carbonate, as CaCO3
Alpha radiation
Aluminum, Dissolved
Barium Strontium P.S.
Barium, Dissolved
Beta radiation
Bicarbonates
Biochemical Oxygen Demand
Cadmium, Dissolved
Calcium, Dissolved
Cesium 137
Chemical Oxygen Demand
Chloride
Chromium (VI)
Chromium (VI), dissolved
Chromium, (III)
Chromium, Dissolved
Cobalt, dissolved
Coliform
Color
Conductivity
Hardness
Heterotrophic plate count
Iron, Dissolved
Lithium, Dissolved
Magnesium, Dissolved
Manganese, Dissolved
Nickel, Dissolved
Nitrate, as N
Nitrogen, Total as N
Oil and Grease
Petroleum hydrocarbons
pH
Phenols
Potassium, Dissolved
Radium
Radium 226
Radium 228
Salt
Scale Inhibitor
Selenium, Dissolved
Silver, Dissolved
Sodium, Dissolved
Revised Draft SGEI S 2011, Page 5-105
CAS Number Parameters Detected in Flowback from PA and WV Operations
Strontium, Dissolved
Sulfide
Surfactants
Total Alkalinity
Total Dissolved Solids
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen
Total Organic Carbon
Total Suspended Solids
Volatile Acids
Xylenes
Zinc, Dissolved
Thanks Mr. Baker for listing the toxic chemicals that do not exist for Jean Michael LeTennier. I guess ignorance is bliss Mr. LeTennier maybe North Dakota is not the only area that has their heads in the sand. The only Bull shit is the lies big oil is telling you about how safe fracking is.
Education of the sleeping masses is imperative
They’ve had 4 years ! What have they been doing all this time?
Am still waiting to hear about all these environmental disasters in PA but all I see across the state line is people with jobs, landowners with money in their pockets and cheap energy.
Like anything if fracking isn’t done properly then it could go wrong. But seriously, show me where these wells are polluting water and killing wildlife etc…. happy to be persuaded but all I see is emotion and ranting.
I have contacted all elected officials in my City of Ithaca, at least those who had not signed on to this—and now most of them have signed it: the mayor and 6/8 members of Common Council!
Our City officials who have not yet signed onto this specific letter, as of today are Alderpersons Kerslick and Mohlenhoff who I have contacted personally.