Catskill Mountainkeeper
A group of landowners in Tioga County in Western New York State have reached an agreement with gas drillers’ eCorp and GasFrac Energy Services to open up 130,000 acres to gas drilling and to use liquid propane gas (LPG) as a fracking agent. The coalition’s strategy appears to be to bypass the current de facto moratorium on high-volume hydraulic fracturing through the use of this alternative fracking agent.
Our lawyers have advised us that New York law does not permit fracking with LPG because given its significant risk of adverse environmental impacts any application to use it would first require its own supplemental-generic or site-specific environmental impact statement. It is unfathomable that the state would consider allowing a process that forces explosive liquid propane gas underground under high pressure without first doing the proper environmental review.
What we do know is that this dangerous new technology resulted in two explosions/fires in 2011—one left three workers hospitalized and one worker with second degree burns—and the second, a flash fire, injured about a dozen workers, two of whom had to be evacuated to the hospital by helicopter. In a third incident, GasFrac Energy Services of Alberta Canada, the company who pioneered this technology, had to shut down the company for two weeks in January 2012 while they investigated a fire at a well site.
GasFrac has touted fracking with liquid propane as a major breakthrough because it eliminates the need for the millions of gallons of water that are needed to frack each well, however, it is not at all clear that fracking with liquid propane gas is any less threatening to the environment or to people’s health than water based fracking. There has been no independent empirical analysis or scientific studies done of the complete life cycle of the process and the only information about it comes from the company’s marketing materials, which claim, for instance, that it is a “green” alternative to water based approaches.
Also, the elimination of water does not eliminate the need to truck this highly explosive gas to the well sites, the need for chemicals in the fracking solution or the threat of air pollution. It doesn’t solve the problem of methane leaks and its highly combustible composition brings new levels of danger for both workers and residents. For more information on the dangers of propane fracking, see our website.
The bottom line is that fracking with liquid propane gas should not be allowed in New York State.
Join us in writing to your legislators and Gov. Cuomo demanding that this process be banned.
We often ask you to write to government officials, and some of you may feel that you have already expressed your objections to fracking; however, it is critical in this fight that we keep up the pressure and that our elected officials hear from us again and again about why fracking is too great a risk to our health and the well-being of our communities to be done in New York State.
And mention that you don’t want propane fracking in New York when you call Gov. Cuomo as part of our “DON’T FRACK FRIDAYS” call campaign. His office can be reached at (518) 474-8390.
For more information, click here.
























The whole fracking way of getting oil and gas is just wrong wrong wrong…it is a hurry up and make the money and to hell with the earth and the workers and the people who have to live where they are drilling…using propane is a night mare waiting to happen…my state of Montana is being hit with this and the people walk around with $ signs in there eyes….quality of life in the drilling towns is shot…the way they were drilling worked just fine and with less impact on everything…stop the madness please.
Propane costs more than the natural gas its going for…whose doing the math here?
The propane comes back up out of the ground and is a natural component of what they are drilling for in the first place. Opposition to fracking is irrational and hysterical. From an article on CNN’ web site:
“While tens of thousands of gas wells have been drilled across the country in recent years, [Professor Mark Zoback of Stanford University] says there have been relatively few cases of chemicals contaminating drinking water supplies. ‘The number is more like dozens,’ said Zoback.”
Over blown and over hyped fears of fracking is nothing more than the magical thinking of disturbed people who are incapable of discerning between their nightmares and reality.
Anti-technology Luddites must not be given veto power over the prosperity of America.
Amen.
Word dude.
First of all the propane would be caputered along with the gas secondly the amount of propane used to frac compared to the amount of gas that would be produced is a small fraction. Its such a shame that the media doesnt educate the general public on the true facts
eCorp is selling working interests – which are securities – in wildcat exploration wells
To unsophisticated investors – the landowners – in exchange for their mineral rights
Which is securities fraud
http://www.scribd.com/doc/90510476/Tioga-Landowners-Propane-Clusterfrack
Fracing my seem “wrong wrong wrong” to somebody that is uneducated in the oil & gas industry but it is a must when costs are so high to receive the highest potential out of a well. And costs for completing a well are getting larger due to the many required tests the oil companys conduct to send to the state to ensure there is no communication between the well that is to be fraced and any unwanted zones. 4-18-2012 Natural Gas = $1.97 ……. LPG = $1.65…..
The gas industry adds chemicals to fracking water because ordinary water has a hydrogen bond angle of only 104.5 degrees. My technology increases the hydrogen bond angle to 113.8 degrees (rounded off to 114 degrees)…WITHOUT chemicals! A town in CO used my technology and saved millions because they didn’t have to build a wastewater treatment plant after being fined $10,000/day by the State for months because water treatment companies said their 5 acre waste lagoon with over 10 million gallons of e-coli bacteria was “untreatable”! The U of MN, in an outreach program years ago, noted that the bacteria count went from “skyhigh” to ZERO using only TEN gallons of this water ONE TIME and homeowners (doing it themselves) have found it lasts for a year or years. Although this sounds “impossible”, thousands of wells have been done at low cost because I invented this technology and it is patented world wide. The Washington Post wrote an article about it decribing my patents and the results (10,000/day), backed up by the Washington Times, that describes the technology but the gas industry won’t use it in spite of the fact it makes water BETTER (not WORSE!)because the chemical companies will lose money! I was an oil well logging Engineer for Baroid in my youth, so I understand the mindset! John Ellis
I note you say “awaiting moderation”. If you delete part of what I wrote, this will negate the thrust of my comments. Best…John Ellis
Its seems wrong to use examples without the findings off the investigation
It was found in the alberta case that the fire was cause by worker error
Not being trained properly that comes down to training not procedure.
I have been flowing back propane fracs now for just over a year and in my opinion
I have better chance blowing up my barbicue then getting hurt at my work.
Mr. Ellis,
You wrote “The gas industry adds chemicals to fracking water because ordinary water has a hydrogen bond angle of only 104.5 degrees.”
I ask you, what are the exact chemicals added by “the gas industry” If you can tell me, then you are the first person on the planet to know, because as of this date, the “gas companies” are protected by our government from disclosing the proprietary chemicals used in the hydraulic fracturing process. Back in 2011, I wrote you a letter with hopes to meet you to discuss what can be done to save the wells in your town of Shohola Pennsylvania, where I saw many concerned neighbors of yours – across the road from your Shohola estate – and these neighbors had signs on their front lawn warning about the dangers of fracking. Your machines have no guarantee of removing all the impurities in fracked well water – because the chemicals are not disclosed. How can anyone claim to remove chemicals from the drinking water when the chemicals are hidden and protected from public university lab-tested evaluation? If you’d like to discuss this with me in the interest of human health – please email me so that I can meet with you to help humanity with this grave concern.
Kind regards,
David
email: ahmt@hushmail.com
http://www.halliburton.com/public/projects/pubsdata/Hydraulic_Fracturing/fluids_disclosure.html
People who can’t find this aren’t looking hard enough….