Oil Change International
By Andy Rowell
Sometimes all you have to do is join the dots.
Let’s take three different headlines from May 29, which are all from The Guardian newspaper in the U.K.
Headline number one: “’Golden age of gas’ threatens renewable energy, IEA warns”.
The article went on to state: “A ‘golden age of gas’ spurred by a tripling of shale gas from fracking and other sources of unconventional gas by 2035 will stop renewable energy in its tracks if governments don’t take action, the International Energy Agency has warned.”
If this is not bad enough for renewables, take headline number two: “Gas rebranded as green energy by EU”.
This article stated: “Energy from gas power stations has been rebranded as a green, low-carbon source of power by a €80 billion European Union programme, in a triumph of the deep-pocketed fossil fuel industry lobby over renewable forms of power.”
On Monday’s blog I talked about how a $4 billion, seven-year lobby campaign by Shell had paved the way for its exploration in the Arctic.
Another intensive lobbying campaign means that EU funds that were supposed to be devoted to research and development into renewables such as solar and wave power are now likely to be diverted, instead to subsidizing the fossil fuel industry.
The irony of the cash-sodden oil industry being even more subsidized by hard pressed EU tax-payers is nearly beyond comprehension.
But beyond that is the dangerous realization that, despite being a fossil fuel, gas is now being considered officially by the EU as a “low-carbon” form of energy, equivalent to renewables.
This becomes even more ironic when you consider our third headline: “Using shale gas over coal does not help climate, says big gas investor”.
OK, let’s get first things first. Gas, extracted under normal conditions is “cleaner” than oil. However, that said, more and more gas being exploited, especially in the U.S., is “shale gas,” which is not cleaner than oil. In fact, it is no better than coal.
Now a leading gas investment fund, the Scottish Widows Investment Partnership, is arguing that due to “fugitive methane” leaking from fracking, shale gas is no better than coal. This is because the leaking methane is 20 times more potent than carbon dioxide.
“This is a very big issue, and has huge implications for climate change, given the pursuit of shale gas,” said Craig Mackenzie, author of the report by Scottish Widows Investment Partnership.
So yesterday’s news can be summed up that gas, especially shale gas, is likely to undermine renewable investment. Anyway, gas is now being seen as low carbon by the EU, and will receive subsidies that should have gone to kick-start the clean, renewable revolution. This is despite the fact that shale gas is no cleaner than dirty coal.
Make sense to you? Me, neither.
Visit EcoWatch’s FRACKING page for more related news on this topic.

























Ban fracking! Sign these three petitions and all the others you come across calling for a ban.
1. http://www.change.org/petitions/stop-natural-gas-development-in-the-susquehanna-river-basin
2. http://action.foodandwaterwatch.org/p/dia/action/public/?action_KEY=6125&track=hp-051811-actioncenter
3.http://www.thepetitionsite.com/5/mothers-against-fracking/
Here i thought you had managed to require the exhaust from plants using natural gas to be cleaner than the input. Not the case anymore ?
I will be an anti fracker if you can show the chemical equations and incontrovertible data which prove natural gas and coal are just as dirty.
To put the fracking business out of business, you could develop something cleaner and cheaper than natural gas. I’ll be your first shareholder.
Somebody needs to develop a solar panel that doesn’t require a lot of plastics and harsh chemicals. Wish those wind turbines didn’t kill so many birds….
Fracking permanently depletes watersheds. I can live without gas, but not without water.
Shale gas production emissions are causing asthma rates to triple in PA. Shallow methane migration is expanding. LNG has an even larger carbon footprint than CNG…
Gas vs Coal is more like a race to the bottom when you take into account the entire shale gas production cycle. Liz R.
Joel,
Per the precautionary principle that I am sure perhaps you would love to eradicate, the burden of safety is on the natural gas industry, not the citizenry that will bear the consequences.
And….is that what life is about, “something cheaper.”
Not to mention earthquakes. When will people understand that the oil, gas, coal industry is all about profits, not about the rest of us. Get a grip, people, it is time we all tried to make sure that this planet is safe for future generations. Even the very rich are going to have to live with the consequences of their actions. This should be a no brainer. However, it is becoming startlingly clear that a lot of people are no brainers.