Ted Glick

Promised Land, the new movie starring Matt Damon, is a movie in part about fracking, the new and extremely problematic way of getting natural gas out of shale rock far below the earth’s surface. It’s a very good movie, with good acting, particularly by Damon in a very different role than, for example, his Jason Bourne trilogy. Instead of being a kick-ass former CIA assassin on a mission to reclaim his memory and the truth about what was done to him, in Promised Land Damon is a conflicted, conscience-stricken, corporate hot shot “land man” using bribes and threats, when necessary, to get people in a small, rural town to agree to let their town be fracked.
But the movie in no way presents all, or even most, of the many problems that come with fracking, much less do so in a clear and convincing way. The primary problem it does present is the very real one of contamination of land and water. This happens as a result of the toxic chemicals, mixed with water and sand, that are forced down into the shale under heavy pressure to break the rock and release the gas within it. Some of that toxic mix comes back up, along with methane, the primary ingredient of natural gas, and there are huge numbers of specific instances of plant and animal deaths, human sickness and water poisoning afterwards that are clear proof of this serious problem.
But there are many more problems from fracking that Promised Land doesn’t mention, much less explain.
- Most importantly, fracking’s huge and growing contribution to our global heating crisis. Methane is 72-105 times as powerful a greenhouse gas as CO2 over the first 20 years after it’s released into the atmosphere. Studies over the past two years, including the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), show that there is much more methane leakage over the lifecycle of fracked, as well as conventionally-produced, natural gas, than the oil and gas industry admits.
- Constant heavy truck traffic transporting water, sand and fracking fluids that pollutes surrounding air, causes damage to roads, creates traffic congestion and noise and other negative impacts.
- The contamination of rivers close to fracking sites through either deliberate dumping of “flowback” toxic wastewater after a well is drilled or through migration of those fluids underground.
- The drawdown of massive amounts of sometimes-scarce—as in historically dry or dought-impacted areas—nearby river and lake water, many millions of gallons per well.
- Documented radiation levels in wastewater 100 or more times the U.S. EPA’s drinking water standard.
- Disruption of other economically- and socially-valued industries or practices, such as agriculture, tourism, hunting and fishing.
- Fragmentation of woods and forests via construction of well sites, pipelines, roads and other infrastructure.
- A decline in property values of homes and land adjacent to or near wells.
- Earthquakes—the U.S. Geological Survey has reported that deep underground injection of drilling wastewater is the probable cause of a six-fold increase in earthquakes in middle America in 2011 compared to 20th century levels.
So if you are looking for a movie about all of these negative realities of fracking, Promised Land is not the movie to watch.
Promised Land is in many ways more a movie about corporate power and the ideology that undergirds it versus the power of an informed people and the old-but-still-good values of love for family, land, home and the truth. The energy company that Damon works for is thoroughly despicable, while individual people who work for it like Damon and the character played by Frances McDormand are shown as more complex, still human, less corporatist in their ideology.
One small but telling example is when a youngish man overly excited about the potential riches he thinks he will gain from signing a lease drives up to Damon in a fancy new car. Because of a prior scene, the movie audience knows that the money he will get from the gas under his land, if there is any, will probably not pay for this car. At the time Damon is struggling with his conscience, and as he looks at the expensive car and the young man you can almost feel his angst, his guilt over what he may have done.
Hal Holbrook is effective as a smart and articulate older teacher who is the only townsperson, at first, aware of some of fracking’s dangers and willing to stand up and say so publicly. Unfortunately, when he does so for the first time, he also describes gas as “clean,” which it absolutely isn’t. He does, however, play a key role in the movie’s successful effort to counterpose a life of place, community and eternal values against the scheming and greed-driven corporate culture that has no difficulty destroying anything in its way.
There’s a lot of food for thought in Promised Land, and I hope large numbers of people see it.
Visit EcoWatch’s FRACKING page for more related news on this topic.
——–
Click here to sign a petition to tell the Bureau of Land Management to issue strong rules for federal fracking leases on public lands.

























Ted Glick’s comments above reflect either an innate misunderstanding about the issues of frac’ing, or else an intentional attempt to downplay the importance of “Promised Land.”
For over three years I have been actively engaged in fighting against urban drilling in densely-populated areas. I have engaged many other activists who have worked for a long time, some as many as ten years or more, on these issues. Our FracDallas website consists of over 130 pages of information that has cost us well over 10,000 collective hours of time and effort to dig out and present, and we have only skimmed the surface because these issues are so complex and often the truth lies buried as deeply below the surface as the gas itself.
The run time for the movie is under two hours. It is not even remotely possible to cover any part of the frac’ing issue in any detail in two hours, let alone cover all the issues associated with it. To assert that the movie failed to touch on those other issues is completely irrelevant and illiterate. The movie is about landmen and how they operate, and it does an excellent job of portraying the conniving, deceitful, deliberate and dishonest way in which landmen operate. In fact, the only part of the movie with which I take issue is the ending where a landman gets a conscience and becomes a decent human being by doing the right thing. That part is pure fantasy. The rest of the movie is accurate, and reflects what I have seen in my numerous dealings with these characters whose first qualification seems to be that of pathological liar.
Further, Glick seems not to understand that burning natural gas IS much cleaner than burning coal, as Hal Holbrook’s character Frank attested. The issue is not how clean natural gas burns, but rather how dirty the extraction process is, and that is a battle we fight every single day. If it were not for the dirty extraction process, then many of us would not oppose natural gas exploration and production.
“Gasland” did not cover all the details about this issue. “Gasland 2″, due out on HBO later this spring, will not cover all the details about this issue, either, because it would take many days and weeks of discussion to fully cover all the details, and few have the patience to sit through a long dissertation about anything, let alone things in which they are not deeply and personally involved.
I have tried to do a thorough job of covering the many detailed facts about natural gas exploration and production on the FracDallas website (http://fracdallas.org.), but is is necessarily limited by constraints of time, energy and money on me and the many others who are contributors to our website.
I strongly recommend “Promised Land” as an excellent expose on how the landmen of the natural gas industry operate, and I strongly recommend seeing “Gasland 2″ when it is available on HBO in a couple of months.
Bravo Well Said!