Print Friendly

Environmental groups believe a large favor was handed to corporations, billionaires and the campaigns they fund when U.S. Supreme Court justices decided Wednesday to strike down overall limits on campaign contributions.

The 5-4 decision in the case of coal executive Shaun McCutcheon v. the Federal Election Commission (FEC) means that individual contributors no longer face a cap on how many candidates and parties they can fund in an election cycle. That unnerves environmental groups who have been fighting against the once-quiet contributions of coal and fossil fuel supporters like the Koch Brothers who fund legislators that favor anti-renewable energy policies.

Courtney Hight, director of the Sierra Club's democracy program, inspires a crowd outside the Supreme Court in Washington following reaction to the McCutcheon v. FEC ruling. Photo credit: @sierraclub/Twitter
Courtney Hight, director of the Sierra Club’s democracy program, inspires a crowd at a rally following the decision in the Supreme Court’s McCutcheon v. FEC case. Photo credit: @sierraclub/Twitter

“The Supreme Court’s decision today in McCutcheon v. FEC fundamentally contradicts the values that sustain our democracy and undermines the notion that our government functions of, by, and for the people,” Sierra Club Executive Director Michael Brune wrote in a statement following the decision.

“To be clear, today the Court capitulated to a coal executive’s demand that he and his fellow big polluters be allowed to dump millions more of their corrupt dollars into politics.”

That coal executive is Shaun McCutcheon of Alabama who bristled at being unable to spread his funds to 27 congress members in 2012. Now, he and his other contributors will have no such worry.

“The McCutcheon ruling shows that the decades-long crisis with money in politics—a serious problem accelerated by Citizens United—has just been turned up another notch,” said Wenonah Hauter, executive director of Food & Water Watch. “With these two rulings, corporations and billionaires like the Koch brothers will be able to use their money to buy more influence in more places, gaining a tighter grip on our government.”

Graphic credit: Center for Responsive Politics
Graphic credit: Center for Responsive Politics

Hauter pointed to some statistics the Center for Responsive Politics that illustrate how much influence the oil and gas industries already had on politics before Wednesday’s ruling. Spending more than $145 million to lobby in Washington, oil and gas was one of the top five industries in terms of political spending. Exxon, Chevron, BP and Koch Industries top most of the annual lists of top funders within the oil and gas realm.

Without an aggregate limit, the Court allows individuals to contribute up to $3.6 million during an election cycle to benefit the parties, candidates and political action committees of his or her liking. The limit was previously $123,200.

“After decades of funding think tanks and judges to promote radical ideas equating money with speech and corporations with people, the big-money men and women who want to have the government in their pocket are at their apex,” Claiborne Deming wrote in a statement on behalf of The Story of Stuff Project. “But history tells us that after hitting the top, the pendulum will begin to swing the other way.”

Brune’s statement exhibited a similar sense of optimism, regarding the ruling as a chance to galvanize those who disagree with it.

“This decision isn’t just an egregious attempt to cede our democracy to corporate rule—it is an opportunity to organize the 91 percent of Americans who want something done about corrupt money in politics,” he said. “The Supreme Court and big polluters have made it clear what side they are on.

Now, we will make clear that its the wrong side.”

——–

YOU ALSO MIGHT LIKE

New Study Exposes Flood of Dark Money Feeding Climate Change Denial

New Report Reveals Koch Brothers Could Make $100B Profit if Keystone XL Pipeline is Built

First Potential Offshore Wind Farm in U.S. Survives Koch-backed Lawsuit, But Faces Another

——–